Which lessons learned can be derived up to this point from the implementation process?
Would this example be a good add to the Wiki?
No
Have relevant internal recommendations / lessons from the WIKI’s best practices been used for the project development?
If yes, which ones and how?
No
Is the development/ implementation of the project affected/ supported by the peer-to-peer knowledge exchange and cooperative problem solving in Smarter Together? How did the peer-to-peer process support the project?
Not yet.
During an informal exchange at the smarter together meeting in Venice, Italy an interesting concept for Vienna came up. Short term before the school starts there is a driving restriction in front of the schools.
The other way round, Venice bought a bus and adapted it, similar to the SIM mobil.
Munich wants to start something similar to beat the street.
Which lessons learned can be derived up to this point from the implementation process?
The cooperation with local clubs (also off topic) is very helpful for reaching broad target groups.
Engagement processes need many resources (people, money, time).
The information evening at Lorystraße was highly frequented (also from working people) because it tackled their own needs.
Project specific events seldom reach a high frequency. It´s better to connect them to existing formats (e.g. “Gehkaffe” from the mobility agency or Walking star from the GB*.
Informations have to be “real” meaning e.g. onsite or something to try out like e-cars or e-bikes. Also the “Gretzlrad” is well used because they can try it out.
Gamification works well, also in a public area and over generations.
Changes produce fear and defence but they also move people which increases the engagement. Through a good moderation and carefully selected measures (no forum discussions but working topic specific in smaller groups) resistances can be dissolved. This makes people active and the willingness to participate is bigger.
A better understanding between developers and tenants is crucial especially in new development areas.
Especially persons with low income (e.g. refugees, single moms) are very open and thankful for energy saving tips. Other persons are rather hard to motivate.
The active group of the e-car sharing in Hauffgasse results in pride of the system. They assume responsibility for the cars and their role. They actively recruit new users for the sharing system. By the introduction of this group, the new technology is accepted in a better way which among others results in a positive impact on the economic efficiency.
Would you describe the project as best practice project and interesting for the WIKI? If yes, in what regard?
Yes, together with SIMmobil.